The acquisition of nuclear weapons has developed in international relations to be the hallmark of a mature military society. Japan is distinctive in world affairs simply because they have never aspired to be a military nuclear power, despite a vast technical and physical capability to build a credible deterrent. This paper outlines what imperatives would need to be fulfilled and what political and public mandates would be necessary for Japan to take the final step in acquiring nuclear capability if they were willing to do so. The methodology of this research utilized the scenario planning method in the pursuit of viable scenarios that might arise to bring Japan to the conclusion that their nation's security mandated the construction of a nuclear deterrent force. The conclusions outlined in the construction of the basis for the scenarios prove that Japan has a legitimate technical basis from which they could build a robust nuclear deterrent. The main relationship that is limiting this ultimate development is the current disparity between the public's mandate to retain Japan's official pacifism and rejection of anything relating to nuclear weapons, and their political leadership's growing awareness that ensuring Japan's security might rely on previously unthinkable means.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
