Argument of David A. Burr, Esq., of Washington, D. C., for the Appellant, in the Case of Woodbury vs. Aldridge, Upon the Appeal of Jonathan Woodbury from the Decision of the Commissioner of Patents, i

Full Title: Argument of David A. Burr, Esq., of Washington, D. C., For the Appellant, in the Case of Woodbury Vs. Aldridge, upon the Appeal of Jonathan Woodbury from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, in the Matter of the Interference

Description: The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926 collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial.Trials provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and divorce.

++++
The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification:
++++




Monograph


Harvard Law School Library
Washington, D.C.: Robbins & Burr, Counsellors and Attorneys in Patent Cases, c.1863