Women's UA Fly-By 2.0 Shorts
Women's UA Fly-By 2.0 Shorts
Hero image 0 of Women's UA Fly-By 2.0 Shorts, 0 of 3
Under Armour

Women's UA Fly-By 2.0 Shorts

3.9 stars out of 385 reviews
(3.9)|
385 ratings
Women's UA Fly-By 2.0 ShortsWomen s UA Fly By 2 0 ShortsWomen s UA Fly By 2 0 Shorts
Color:Gray
selected, Gray, $36.71
Other options
White, $17.49, was $19.88
$19.88

Key item features

  • Lightweight woven fabric delivers superior comfort & durability
  • Material wicks sweat & dries really fast
  • Super-breathable mesh panels dump excess heat
  • Built-in brief for enhanced coverage
  • Ultra comfortable, soft knit waistband with internal drawcord
  • Crossover, shaped hem for a streamlined look
  • Inseam: 3.5""
  • Loose: Fuller cut for complete comfort.
Price when purchased online
Report an issue with this seller

More seller options (1)

Starting from $36.71

About this item

Product details

Specifications

Directions

Warranty

Customer ratings & reviews

3.9 out of 5 stars
stars385 ratings385 reviews
How item rating is calculated
  1. 5 stars58% (223)
  2. 4 stars17% (65)
  3. 3 stars8% (31)
  4. 2 stars6% (22)
  5. 1 star11% (44)

Customer photos

Filtered and sorted results would be available on the new 'Customer ratings & reviews' page.
Sort by |

Showing 1-3 of 385 reviews

Jul 10, 2020
BananaRama
5 out of 5 stars review

No POCKETS???

Why did the pockets get removed?? The old version of these are my favorite gym/running/quarantine shorts BECAUSE of the pockets. They can fit phone, keys, gum, and mask! They are also over the top comfortable. I don't think I can buy any lesser version than the ones I have. I only have 3 of the old version with the pockets so, I've been doing laundry every 3 days. BRING BACK THE POCKETS!...Or kindly direct me to the correct link if that version still exists.

Review from underarmour.com
Helpful?1HUJU0FAZLPE675017020
Sep 26, 2020
fm123
4 out of 5 stars review

Good fit, odd pocket placement, see-through

I like the fit of these shorts. I'm 5'4" and 130 lbs and small fits well. I really liked the white/black/purple color combo but knew there would be a good chance that the liner in these shorts would be white and end up having a huge contrast with my skin color but took a gamble anyways. However what I did not expect was a pocket sewn into the back of the shorts on the liner. That means that are is a sizeable rectangular patch that is so easily seen through the back of the shorts. The awkward, visible pocket on the butt is why I docked one star. If you get a different color that shouldn't be a problem. I really wish Under Armour would make nude color liners in their light shorts so us darker folks could wear them.

Review from underarmour.com
Helpful?1HUJU0FAZLPE675017020
Feb 12, 2020
Krod78
3 out of 5 stars review

Different fit

So I came on here looking for more fly-by running shorts. I love the Fly-by original, the pockets are the best. I saw the updated shorts and ordered two pair of the 2.0 and they do fit differently than the original. The 2.0 fits a little snugger, and the new waist band is definitely tighter. I'm 5'4 111lbs and ordered a small. I personally like the original better.

Review from underarmour.com
Helpful?1HUJU0FAZLPE675017020
reply from Supplier Response

We appreciate you taking the time to provide us with this feedback. We have forwarded your review to our Product Development Team for examination.