Rothco 2037 Women Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants, Woodland Camo - Medium
Rothco 2037 Women Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants, Woodland Camo - Medium
Hero image 0 of Rothco 2037 Women Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants, Woodland Camo - Medium, 0 of 2

Rothco 2037 Women Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants, Woodland Camo - Medium

2.7 stars out of 3 reviews
(2.7)|
3 ratings
Color:Woodland Camo
selected, Woodland Camo, $47.99
Tri-Color Desert Camo, $33.99, Out of stock
White, $33.99, Out of stock
ACU Digital Camo, Unavailable
Beige, Unavailable
Subdued Pink Camo, Unavailable
Clothing Size:M

Key item features

  • 100% Cotton
  • Soft, washed fabric
  • Cargo pants with classic style
  • Loose fit
  • Drawstring waist
Current price is $47.99
Price when purchased online
  • Free shipping
  • Free 30-day returns

How do you want your item?

How do you want your item?
Columbus, 43215
Arrives by Tue, Apr 14
|
Sold and shipped by Army UniversePro Seller
4.461741424802111 stars out of 5, based on 758 seller reviews(4.5)
Report an issue with this seller
Free 30-day returns

More seller options (1)

Starting from $53.99

About this item

Product details

Specifications

Directions

Warranty

Customer ratings & reviews

2.7 out of 5 stars
stars3 ratings3 reviews
How item rating is calculated
Filtered and sorted results would be available on the new 'Customer ratings & reviews' page.
Sort by |

Showing 1-3 of 3 reviews

Aug 12, 2020
Paula
4 out of 5 stars review

Verified Purchase

Good quality, if you are usually a medium get me

Got large because reviews said get 1 size smaller than chart. Should have got medium. That is what I wear in other pants. However since have draw strings will work and I can wear heavier clothes under them for winter hiking. Tough material.

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF170659532
Jul 23, 2015
TAugustus
3 out of 5 stars review

Not for a hippy woman

They run too small for a woman with wide hips..

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF170659532
Feb 16, 2018
plunk
1 out of 5 stars review

very small

they were marked woman's 2X, no way are they a woman's 2X very much smaller, which was confusing since the description recommended sizing up.

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF170659532