(Price/PR)Rothco 3386 Womens Camo Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants-Subdued Urban Digital Camo-XXS
(Price/PR)Rothco 3386 Womens Camo Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants-Subdued Urban Digital Camo-XXS
Hero image 0 of (Price/PR)Rothco 3386 Womens Camo Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants-Subdued Urban Digital Camo-XXS, 0 of 4

(Price/PR)Rothco 3386 Womens Camo Vintage Paratrooper Fatigue Pants-Subdued Urban Digital Camo-XXS

2.7 stars out of 3 reviews
(2.7)|
3 ratings

Key item features

Price is for PR.

Manufacturer Part Number: 3386

Rothco's Women's Camo Vintage Paratrooper Fatigues Super Soft, Yet Incredibly Durable Pants. The Lower Waist Is Lower And Loose For A Comfortable Fit. These Fatigue Pants Are Great For Embellishing And Feature A Washed Cotton Blend Twill With 8 Pockets, Zipper Fly, Low Drawstring Waist And Ankle Ties. Rothco's Women's Paratrooper Fatigues Are Available In 9 Colors Including Woodland Camo, Subdued Pink Camo, O.D., And More. With Sizes And Colors Ranging From XXS To 3XL.

Brand: Rothco

Gender / Age: Womens

Material: Cotton

Material Specs: 55% raime 45% cotton
Price when purchased online
Not Available

How do you want your item?

How do you want your item?
Not available
Report an issue with this seller

About this item

Product details

Specifications

Customer ratings & reviews

2.7 out of 5 stars
stars3 ratings3 reviews
How item rating is calculated
Filtered and sorted results would be available on the new 'Customer ratings & reviews' page.
Sort by |

Showing 1-3 of 3 reviews

Aug 12, 2020
Paula
4 out of 5 stars review

Verified Purchase

Good quality, if you are usually a medium get me

Got large because reviews said get 1 size smaller than chart. Should have got medium. That is what I wear in other pants. However since have draw strings will work and I can wear heavier clothes under them for winter hiking. Tough material.

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF131415910
Jul 23, 2015
TAugustus
3 out of 5 stars review

Not for a hippy woman

They run too small for a woman with wide hips..

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF131415910
Feb 16, 2018
plunk
1 out of 5 stars review

very small

they were marked woman's 2X, no way are they a woman's 2X very much smaller, which was confusing since the description recommended sizing up.

Helpful?266X9KXHLLPF131415910