Bali Womens Skimp Skamp Brief Style-2633

Been wearing these for years and generally pleased. However, it's time to get rid of the tag on the back seam. Also, when I purchase, I usually buy quite a few pairs at a time for the savings. The last three times, whether direct from Bali, or a store, there has been inconsistent sizing. Not one to return underwear, so grateful for purchasing at a lower cost, but maybe when you find a way to print the size on the fabric, like other brands do, you can also reconfigure manufacturing to ensure consistent sizing. Thank you.

I have been buying these briefs for well over 30 years. Workmanship has declined over the last several years. Several pairs have seams that are not stitched completely. A couple of years ago, I sent in a message asking them to go back to the fabric tag in the back I see they are still using the tag that is much more like paper. It scratches the area where it touches the skin. I have to cut the tags out before wearing agin, even after trying to soften them up after several washings. I guess my suggestion fell on deaf ears. Company Logo Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty Image for ★1 star out of 5. Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty★2 stars out of 5. Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty★3 stars out of 5. Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty★4 stars out of 5. Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty★5 stars out of 5. Review for Bali Skimp Skamp Brief Panty You rated this 3 stars out of 5. 1 Share your thoughts Write your review Review text I have been buying these briefs for well over 30 years. Workmanship has declined over the last several years. Several pairs have seams that are not stitched completely. A couple of years ago, I sent in a message asking them to go back to the fabric tag in the back I see they are still using the tag that is much more like paper. It scratches the area where it touches the skin. I have to cut the tags out before wearing again, even after trying to soften them up after several washings. I guess my suggestion fell on deaf ears.