Brooklyn Armed Forces Twill M65 Jacket, Woodland Camo
Brooklyn Armed Forces Twill M65 Jacket, Woodland Camo
Hero image 0 of Brooklyn Armed Forces Twill M65 Jacket, Woodland Camo, 0 of 2

Brooklyn Armed Forces Twill M65 Jacket, Woodland Camo

|3 ratings
Actual Color:Woodland-Out of stock
Clothing Size:XL-Out of stock

Key item features

Brooklyn Armed Forces Twill M65 Jacket, Woodland Camo
Current price is $89.99
Price when purchased online
Out of stock

How do you want your item?

How do you want your item?
Out of stock
Report an issue with this seller

About this item

Product details

Specifications

Warranty

Customer ratings & reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
stars3 ratings3 reviews
How item rating is calculated
Filtered and sorted results would be available on the new 'Customer ratings & reviews' page.
Sort by |

Showing 1-3 of 3 reviews

Jul 2, 2025
Jeff A
5 out of 5 stars review

This is a quality buy!

Quality

Review from sportsmansguide.com
Helpful?4W8CSGARZXT45068211786
Dec 30, 2023
Rocky
5 out of 5 stars review

Im too fat

Well made with the same features i got in 1972.

Review from sportsmansguide.com
Helpful?4W8CSGARZXT45068211786
Apr 1, 2024
Walmart customer
3 out of 5 stars review

Almost great!

Almost great. It appears to be well made. Huge cuffs and velcro thankfully to keep it from coming over your hands. I ordered an XL. I'm 5-9 and average build. Not a big gut or anything and XL always fits me with good amount of room. This jacket is almost too snug to get on, but good arm movement with very roomy sleeves. However, around the waist it clearly was sewn wrong maybe, because its tighter around the gut while loose in arms and chest. I love the jacket as a good replica of original field coat, but just not correct fit. Hopefully being almost too tight won't cause the zipper to fail early. You have to very strongly pull the sides together to zip it up or snap the buttons. Once done its not too horribly tight, but no room for under layers at all, much less a liner. Brooklyn could do better, or they built mine wrong. I know a 2X would be way too baggy.

Review from sportsmansguide.com
Helpful?4W8CSGARZXT45068211786