Nike Men's Air Max 95 Prm Running Shoe

I started using these shoes in 1.0 version-excellent. 1.5 not bad. Had enough stashed to avoid the 2.0 since reviews pointed to a disaster "updated design". 3.0 is the worst version-small toe box, cramped foot platform; found a pair 2.0 with hope they would work. No luck; direct side by side comparison with my old 1.5s showed just what reviewers had said-shrunk foot bed width, tighter fabric usage generating a more cramped feel. Avoid this shoe. The closest I've found to the original fit is the Lone Peak 5 but it doesn't possess the same level of cushion. I have fears that VF the owner will destroy this shoe too. This is a classic uipdate disaster driven by a designer in combination with potentially an account who is looking for manufacturing materials cost saving all to fulfill a non-existent marketing manager design update need. The best thing this company could do is pull out the CAD drawings of the 1.0 or 1.5 out of computer storage and put them back into production. Given what I've read they'd get a lot of lost customers/supports back to the brand. I love my TIMP 1.5; why did you ruin such a terrific shoe!!

I wish these other reviews had been up when I bought my Timp 3s to replace an older pair of Timps. The delamination others have noted happened to me after my very first trail run! No excuse for such poor design and construction. I love the fit and feel of the Timp and felt lucky to still be able to find the previous generation online. But won't be buying another pair of Timps until they are updated.